Collateral warranties: a construction contract?
The High Court has previously decided that collateral warranties are not construction contracts, meaning that there would be no associated recourse to statutory adjudication for disputes under collateral warranties. However, In the case of Abbey Healthcare (Mill Hill) Ltd v Simply Construct (UK) LLP [2022], the Court of Appeal has overturned this decision by finding that collateral warranties can in fact be construction contracts, and disputes under collateral warranties may therefore be capable of being referred for resolution via adjudication.
Here are the points to consider when assessing if a collateral warranty is a construction contract:
- Is the warranty in respect of ongoing obligations, or in respect of a past static state of affairs. Key wording to look out for is any wording similar to "performed and will continue to perform diligently its obligations under the contract".
- Detailed payment obligations are not required, payment of a single amount (even a nominal sum) is sufficient to comply with the Construction Act.
- The date of the warranty does not matter, it is the contents that is important. A delay between completion of the works and the execution of the warranty does not have an impact.
Permission for an appeal to the Supreme Court has been granted in this case, and so a further update on the status of collateral warranties as construction contracts may be required in the near future. In the meantime, careful and specific drafting of collateral warranties can give certainty on this and other issues.