Property litigation weekly update - 10 September 2020


Share

This week we report on the new prescribed form in connection with a section 21 notice for residential possession proceedings, the government's proposed Shared Ownership model and a recent case concerning a former guarantor's obligations to pay substantial sums due under a lease. Insight from our colleagues around the firm and the usual positive news (providing Covid escapism).

New prescribed form for section 21 notices

As we reported last week, from 29 August 2020 onwards landlords have to give tenants six months' notice of their intention to take possession proceedings, the aim of this being to support tenants over the winter months.

The Assured Tenancies and Agricultural Occupancies (Forms) (England) (Amendment) and Suspension (Coronavirus) Regulations 2020 provide for a new prescribed Form 6A for England (for a section 21 notice) to include the 6 month notice period. The form is available from the gov.uk website and must be used.

Unhelpfully, the Regulations did not come into effect until 2 September, some days after 29 August 2020, creating a couple of days worth of confusion and a legal grey area where a 6 month notice period was required but the prescribed form 6A (which must be used) stated 3 months' notice. It may not be long before the Courts consider a case where a tenant was served with a section 21 notice on 31 August or 1 September 2020.

Proposed new shared ownership model

On 8 September 2020 the Housing Secretary announced a new Shared Ownership model. Amongst other changes (e.g staircasing to be available in 1% increments), the most noteworthy development is that the Government proposes introducing a 10-year period for new shared owners where the landlord will cover the cost of any repairs and maintenance.

It remains to be seen how this will be funded, but if landlords of Shared Ownership leases are required to cover these costs without any additional financial assistance, landlords will need to be aware of what could be a large additional financial burden when assessing viability and tenure mix of new schemes.

The Government will be publishing a further technical consultation on the implementation of the new model of Shared Ownership in due course – which we will be keenly following.

In the meantime, the Housing Secretary's announcement can be read in full here.

EMI Group Ltd v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd 2020

This recent case considered the validity of a guaranteed authorised guarantee agreement (known as a GAGA) which had been given, on the assignment of a lease, by the outgoing tenant's guarantor, EMI Group Limited (EMI) to guarantee the outgoing tenant's obligations under an authorised guarantee agreement (known as an AGA).

Following the insolvency of both the outgoing tenant (HMV) and the current tenant (Forever21), the landlord, Prudential, served Section 17 notices (under section 17 of the Landlord and Tenant (Covenants) Act 1995 ("the Act") claiming the outstanding rent and service charges from EMI pursuant to the GAGA. EMI applied to Court for a declaration as to its liability under the GAGA, relying on the following four arguments:

  1. The operative wording in the GAGA meant that EMI was obliged to indemnify the tenant and any future tenant contrary to section 25 of the Act and such wording offended the Act;
  2. Wording in the lease left EMI open to liability if the Lease was reassigned to HMV, again offending the Act;
  3. The landlord had to be reasonable when requiring an AGA but there was no such restriction for the GAGA, meaning that there was unequal treatment of tenant and guarantor, contrary to the Act;
  4. The dissolution of HMV meant that EMI was no longer bound by the Lease covenants.

None of these arguments succeeded. The Court did not accept EMI's interpretation of the contractual wording on (1) and (2) above and noted in any event that wording which offended the Act was to be severed only so far as necessary, allowing other obligations to survive (and indeed the lease also contained such a provision). It was further held that EMI's GAGA had been validly provided in accordance with section 24(2) of the Act:- the Act would only have been contravened if the terms of the AGA were such as not to release the guarantor to the same extent as the tenant, which was not the case. Lastly, the GAGA given by EMI remained valid as the lease explicitly provided that it was to survive the dissolution of HMV. This final point illustrates the importance of a well-drafted guarantee which anticipates future eventualities and ensures that, insofar as possible within the constraints of the Act, the guarantor's obligations survive.

Insights from around the firm 

 
Positive news

  • A 24 year old hospital volunteer, Tayla Wright, has struck up an unlikely friendship with Ken Smith a 94 year old who was a patient. The pair have since continued their friendship and meet up on a weekly basis. Ken's family have said that Tayla was a 'lifeline' and has really improved Ken's mental wellbeing.
  •  Stormzy, a grime artist, has dedicated his recent 'Superheroes' video to Black Panther's Chadwick Boseman who passed away recently. The track encourages young people to see the hero in themselves.
  • Kavaan the 'world's loneliest elephant' receives medical clearance for the move to an animal sanctuary after over 35 years of living alone in a zoo in Pakistan. Activists have successfully campaigned for his release and he is mostly likely to be sent to a sanctuary in Cambodia.
Insight

Property litigation weekly update - 24 September 2020

Explore
Insight

Trowers presents: Can ESG in real estate investment help accelerate recovery?

Explore
Insight

Trowers talks podcast: What does the provision of care infrastructure look like in the UK?

Explore
Insight

Termination of building contracts under the new Corporate Insolvency and Governance Act – avoid being locked in

Explore
Insight

VAT treatment of cladding works –  zero is the hero

Explore
News

Two Trowers lawyers named as consultees on modular housing report

Explore