Cabinet Office Procurement Policy Note - Supplier relief due to Covid-19
Action Note PPN 02/20 – March 2020
- Organisations are required to review all of their existing contracts to identify the suppliers who they believe are at risk. Organisations should then inform those "at risk suppliers" that they will continue to be paid until the end of June, even where service delivery is disrupted or temporarily suspended. In practice, we have seen in-scope organisations sending out questionnaires to all supply-chain members, placing the onus on suppliers to identify themselves as "at risk".
- There is no guidance as to what makes a supplier "at risk". It could be queried whether this means at risk of insolvency or whether it means the supplier is unable to access any of the BEIS business support measures and that consequently, this payment regime could be one of last resort?
- For an "at risk" supplier, organisations should then put in place payment measures to support supplier cash flow during these advance payments. In practice, a contracting authority might maintain the existing contractual rates, or may elect to pay in accordance with revised milestones, interim payments, or forward ordering. Where a contract operates on a "payment by result" or "output/outcome" basis, pre-payments to suppliers should be calculated as an average of the last three months' invoices.
- PPN 02/20 also notes that any pre-payment in these circumstances should not include profit on any undelivered element of the contract, and all payments should be made on an open-book basis.
- In order to qualify for pre-payments, at risk suppliers will need to agree to act on an open book basis and to make cost data available to contracting authorities during this period. Suppliers should also commit to continue paying employees and flow down relevant pre-payments to their subcontractors.
- There is no requirement to make pre-payments to suppliers in respect of contracts where there is no contractual volume commitment to supply. PPN 02/20 also suggests that organisations should give careful consideration to pre-payments where a supplier has been underperforming and is subject to an existing improvement plan.
- Organisations should carefully consider the risks associated with any pre-payment, and should ensure that they carefully document those risks and the decisions taken in respect of each at risk supplier. Organisations should carefully consider the risks associated with any pre-payment, and should ensure that they carefully document those risks and the decisions taken in respect of each at risk supplier. Contract variations should be agreed and examples of possible variations include: a clear reconciliation and repayment mechanism; security (such as advance payment bonds); vesting certificates; and suspending any rights under the contract to terminate "at will" until the pre-paid amounts have been expended properly once contract performance is renewed.
- Organisations should also note that the provisions of this PPN 02/20 run in parallel with contractual processes, rights and potential remedies. The contractual position should not be forgotten and any measures adopted under this PPN 02/20 needs to be agreed in accordance with the contractual provisions. Organisations are advised to firstly try and work with suppliers to vary or amend the contract if the supplier is claiming contractual relief, with such amendments being limited and drafted specifically to each case. Otherwise, each claim for relief should be assessed based on the specific contractual provisions and the circumstances of each case and advice sought if necessary. Notably the advice is to not accept clams from suppliers who were already struggling to meet their contractual obligations prior to the outbreak. However, these suppliers may be the very ones 'at risk' (depending on how that is to be determined).