Homophobic remarks and the Equal Treatment Directive


Share

Advocate General Sharpston has given her opinion in NH v Associazione Avvocatura per i diritti LGBTI – Rete Lenford that homophobic remarks made by an interviewee on a radio programme about not employing gay lawyers were capable of amounting to discrimination under the Equal Treatment Framework Directive.

A senior lawyer declared on an Italian radio programme that he would never hire a homosexual person to work in his law firm.  A discrimination claim was brought by an association for LGBT lawyers, and an Italian court upheld the claim and ordered the lawyer to pay damages of EUR10,000 and to formulate an action plan.  The Italian Supreme Court subsequently referred the claim to the ECJ.

The Advocate General found that, even though there was no active recruitment exercise at the time the remarks were made, they were capable of hindering access to employment.  It was for the national court to decide whether there was a sufficient link which was more than "purely hypothetical".  The Advocate General also considered the issue of whether an association had standing to bring a claim.  Articles 8 and 9 of the Directive permit national legislation which gives associations, provided they have a legitimate interest, the right to bring proceedings to enforce the Directive in the absence of an identifiable victim.  Where legitimate interest is made out it is open to an association to ask for discriminatory conduct to be sanctioned in an effective, proportionate and dissuasive manner (which can include an award of damages). 

Take note:  It's worth noting that if Advocate General Sharpston's opinion is followed by the ECJ, it may have implications for the Equality and Human Rights Commission's enforcement powers.

Insight

HR Law – February 2023

Explore
Insight

Being a successful Employer of the Future: A Trowers Tuesday series

Explore
Insight

Webinar – Trowers Tuesday: Successful changes and restructures

Explore
Insight

Dismissal of employee on long-term sickness absence was not discrimination arising from disability

Explore
Insight

Strikes (Minimum Services) Bill introduced in the House of Commons 

Explore
Insight

Update on the Retained EU Law (Revocation and Reform) Bill

Explore