High Court refuses permission for ClientEarth to bring derivative action on behalf of Shell plc against its directors


ClientEarth's application for permission to bring a derivative claim on behalf of Shell plc ("Shell") against Shell's board of directors for alleged failure to manage and address climate change risks has been dismissed by the High Court of England and Wales.

The "ground-breaking" derivative claim issued by ClientEarth was the first of its kind, seeking to hold directors of a company personally liable for allegedly failing to adequately address the "material and foreseeable risk" of climate change on their business. 

ClientEarth's claim may have fallen at the first procedural hurdle but the heat is still very much ‎‎on businesses and their directors to ensure that they adequately manage the risks and impact of ‎‎climate change on their business. The claim serves as a useful reminder of the growing public and ‎investor scrutiny placed on businesses to mitigate environmental risks and reduce emissions. ClientEarth has been granted a hearing at which the Court will be asked to reconsider this decision ‎so this is very much a matter of watch this space.

Alex Sharples‎, Senior Associate and Annie Joseph, Associate in our Commercial Litigation team ‎‎explore the implications of this decision in detail here.

 

Insight

Anthony Lyons v Bridging Finance Inc – Statutory Demands and the Wrong Forum

Explore
Insight

Extended Civil Restraint Orders

Explore
Insight

Bankrupt can sell a London property subject to a freezing order 

Explore
Insight

Managing cyber security and data protection – a meeting of minds?

Explore
News

Trowers & Hamlins hires new partner and further bolsters Energy and Sustainability offering

Explore
Insight

Why heads of terms matter?

Explore